Related Compounds
Compounds connected by the same goals, effects, or research topics.
We use privacy-friendly analytics. Read our privacy policy.
Compound Profile
Systematic review suggests sleep improvements in healthy populations with longer term glycine administration, but sleep studies were small and high risk of bias.
Use extra caution — May support subjective sleep quality; evidence is early and based on small trials. Details

Bottom line
On the evidence: A handful of small trials on sleep quality; evidence base is limited.
Best for
Not ideal for
Why not higher
Why not lower
Practical takeaway: A cheap, low-risk add-on worth a short trial for sleep quality — not a stand-alone fix for significant insomnia.
Safety
May support subjective sleep quality; evidence is early and based on small trials. | Do not imply proven insomnia treatment or anti aging benefits.
High caution
Caution level: High. Multiple caution categories apply, or the record uses avoid/contraindication language.
Evidence-based safety
Severity and certainty are shown separately. A high-priority caution can still be theoretical: these pairings are screened from shared contraindication mechanisms and are not automatically documented clinical interactions. Provenance identifies the source fields that produced each flag; it does not upgrade the certainty of the pairwise claim.
Sedation / CNS depression
Representative pairings are shown below. Large mechanism groups are intentionally summarized to keep profiles focused and crawl-efficient.
Data provenance recorded for 68 of 68 pairings in this mechanism group.
+56 more pairings share this mechanism. Use the Safety Checker to review a specific combination.
Useful signal, but study design, dose, and population still matter.
Human clinical evidence: Present in source signals
Mechanistic / preclinical: Mechanism mapped — Neurotransmitter Modulation · Neurotransmission Inhibition · Glycine Receptor Modulation
Research maturity: Established research — main contexts: Glycine Receptor · NMDA Receptor · Glutathione System
Safety boundary: Safety note available — May support subjective sleep quality; evidence is early and based on small trials.
This profile cites 4 human studies.
Confidence estimate based on the design quality and consistency of published clinical trials.
Glycine has a moderate evidence rating.
Evaluation of methodological rigor, population reach, and evidence alignment.
Each grade reflects the strength and consistency of published human evidence — not marketing claims. Grades are based on study count, design quality, effect size, consistency, and recency.
Filter by study class
Showing 4 of 4 studies.
What the evidence actually shows
This table contains 4 structured sources, including 1 human evidence source; 0 are human trials.
| Study | Design | N | Dose | Duration | Population | Outcome | Result & magnitude | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2023 Background | Systematic review Uses a predefined method to find and evaluate relevant studies, but may or may not pool their results statistically. | — | — | — | — | — | — | DOI → |
2007 Background | Other / unclear The study design is not yet classified clearly enough to infer its place in the evidence hierarchy. | — | — | — | — | — | — | DOI → |
2012 Background | Other / unclear The study design is not yet classified clearly enough to infer its place in the evidence hierarchy. | — | — | — | — | — | — | DOI → |
Subjective effects of glycine ingestion before bedtime on sleep quality 2006 Background | Other / unclear The study design is not yet classified clearly enough to infer its place in the evidence hierarchy. | — | — | — | — | — | — | DOI → |
Simplified mechanism pathway based on preclinical and pharmacological evidence. Does not confirm clinical efficacy.
Mechanism Pathway — How Glycine Works
Preclinical mechanism details from scientific profiles; these represent plausible pathways but do not guarantee clinical efficacy in humans.
Condition guides
Also in this cluster
Sleep & Recovery guide →Continue exploring
Compounds connected by the same goals, effects, or research topics.
Botanicals connected by the same goals, effects, or research topics.
Deeper context, comparisons, and practical research paths.
Deeper context, comparisons, and practical research paths.
Safety checks and cautions relevant to this decision.
Compare side-by-side tradeoffs or verify active marker guidelines.
Free safety checklist
Occasional research updates, safety context, and product-quality checks for supplement decisions.
We use your email to send the checklist and occasional evidence-first supplement updates. Unsubscribe anytime. Privacy policy.
Sourcing options
Product recommendations are not shown for this profile because the current site safety and monetization policy does not permit them.
When sourcing Glycine, verify the label for:
Safety first · Harm reduction
This information is educational and not medical advice. Start low, avoid risky combinations, and consult a licensed clinician before making health decisions—especially if you use medications, have diagnosed conditions, or are pregnant/breastfeeding.
Learn how we evaluate confidence, safety, and intensity on the methodology page.
Checked against primary sources, cited evidence, and contraindication language before publication. Evidence claims, safety language, and affiliate modules are reviewed independently. Not personal medical advice.
Help improve this profile
These controls record only the page and the structured choice you make when analytics consent is enabled. Please don’t include personal medical information in research requests.
Was this evidence summary clear?
Did you find what you were researching?