Herb Profile

Elecampane

Inula helenium

Elecampane (Inula helenium) carries a Grade C rating — limited evidence.

Last reviewed: •3 sources citedReport a correctionProfile-wide ·C Limited

Use extra caution — Culinary or tea use is usually lower risk, but concentrated oils/extracts can irritate GI or mucosal tissue. Details

Evidence
Limited Evidence
Typical onset
Varies by prep
Safety rating
High caution
Best for
Digestive, Respiratory
Avoid / review if
Pregnancy Because Of Traditional Use As A Uterine Stimulant
Elecampane monograph visual
Generated profile category visual

At a glance

From this profile's structured data
Evidence
Grade C
Safety
Culinary or tea use is usually lower risk, but concentrated oils/extracts can irritate GI or mucosal tissue.
Profile context
digestive, respiratory
Next steps

Continue reading

  • If you want to browse more herbs → All herbs

Safety

Safety & Cautions

Culinary or tea use is usually lower risk, but concentrated oils/extracts can irritate GI or mucosal tissue. Avoid pregnancy dose escalation and use caution with reflux/allergy.

High caution

Caution level: High. Multiple caution categories apply, or the record uses avoid/contraindication language.

  • Interaction-AwareMedication or interaction context is explicitly noted.
  • Stimulant-Like ProfileStimulant-like or activating caution language is present.
Detailed safety fields

Pregnancy, breastfeeding, and contraindications

  • Pregnancy Because Of Traditional Use As A Uterine Stimulant

Safety classifications

  • Interaction-Aware: Medication or interaction context is explicitly noted.
  • Stimulant-Like Profile: Stimulant-like or activating caution language is present.

Full safety note

  • Culinary or tea use is usually lower risk, but concentrated oils/extracts can irritate GI or mucosal tissue. Avoid pregnancy dose escalation and use caution with reflux/allergy.

Safety labels

  • Interaction-Aware
  • Stimulant-Like Profile

Evidence-based safety

Caution when combined

Severity and certainty are shown separately. A high-priority caution can still be theoretical: these pairings are screened from shared contraindication mechanisms and are not automatically documented clinical interactions. Provenance identifies the source fields that produced each flag; it does not upgrade the certainty of the pairwise claim.

Moderate Caution

110 flagged pairings

Blood-sugar lowering

Representative pairings are shown below. Large mechanism groups are intentionally summarized to keep profiles focused and crawl-efficient.

Blood-sugar loweringCertainty: Theoretical

Data provenance recorded for 110 of 110 pairings in this mechanism group.

+98 more pairings share this mechanism. Use the Safety Checker to review a specific combination.

Evidence

Evidence Summary

Evidence lens

Read as directional context, not settled clinical proof.

LimitedLimited Evidence

Human clinical evidence: Not the primary signal

Mechanistic / preclinical: Mechanism mapped — Traditional Respiratory Support · Digestive Support

Research maturity: Theoretical / mechanistic research — Mechanistic or unresolved evidence is kept separate from established human outcomes.

Safety boundary: Safety note available — Culinary or tea use is usually lower risk, but concentrated oils/extracts can irritate GI or mucosal tissue.

This profile cites 3 human studies.

Study design details
Evidence Grade

Grade C: Limited Evidence

Evaluation of methodological rigor, population reach, and evidence alignment.

Design Match
Narrative review
Risk of Bias
High
Consistency
Not assessed
Strongest recorded design is a narrative review, drawn from 2 recorded studies, none of which measured an outcome in people.
How evidence grades work

Each grade reflects the strength and consistency of published human evidence — not marketing claims. Grades are based on study count, design quality, effect size, consistency, and recency.

Strong
Multiple RCTs, consistent direction, adequate effect size
Moderate
Some RCTs or consistent observational data in humans
Preliminary / Mixed
Animal or in-vitro only, or conflicting human data
Traditional / Theoretical
Traditional use only; no controlled human trials
Clinical Study Summaries (3)0 human evidence sources · 0 human trials · Participant totals not consistently reported · Consistency not yet classifiable

Filter by study class

Showing 3 of 3 studies.

What the evidence actually shows

This table contains 3 structured sources, including 0 human evidence sources; 0 are human trials.

StudyDesignNDoseDurationPopulationOutcomeResult & magnitudeSource

Systemic allergic dermatitis caused by sesquiterpene lactones

Paulsen E et al. · Contact Dermatitis · 2017

Background
Narrative review

Summarizes selected literature without the full prespecified search and selection methods of a systematic review.

——————PubMed →

Contact allergy and medicinal herbs

Aberer W et al. · J Dtsch Dermatol Ges · 2008

Background
Narrative review

Summarizes selected literature without the full prespecified search and selection methods of a systematic review.

——————PubMed →

Ultrasound and Microwave-Assisted Extraction of Elecampane (Inula helenium) Roots

Petkova N et al. · Nat Prod Commun · 2017

Background
Other / unclear

The study design is not yet classified clearly enough to infer its place in the evidence hierarchy.

——————PubMed →

Dosing & Timing

No standardized dose
Preparation specific; use standardized product label for Aromatic herb/spice forms and essential oils differ greatly and require source backed dosage review before therapeutic claims.
How Elecampane works

Simplified mechanism pathway based on preclinical and pharmacological evidence. Does not confirm clinical efficacy.

Mechanism Pathway — How Elecampane Works

How Elecampane WorksElecampane acts on biological target pathways via digestive support, leading to digestive.ElecampaneBiological TargetBiological pathwayDigestive SupportDigestiveObservable outcome
CompoundTarget / ReceptorMechanismEffect / Outcome
Mechanisms & biological pathways (preclinical)
  • Traditional Respiratory Support
  • Digestive Support

Active Compounds

Key constituents studied in Elecampane, with full pharmacology and safety profiles.

Compare related active botanicals

Explore botanicals with similar chemistry, effects, or safety considerations in the Botanical Activity Atlas.

Guides that use Elecampane

Condition guides

Compare & Sourcing

Compare side-by-side tradeoffs or verify active marker guidelines.

Safety first · Harm reduction

This information is educational and not medical advice. Start low, avoid risky combinations, and consult a licensed clinician before making health decisions—especially if you use medications, have diagnosed conditions, or are pregnant/breastfeeding.

Learn how we evaluate confidence, safety, and intensity on the methodology page.

Editorial Review

Checked against primary sources, cited evidence, and contraindication language before publication. Evidence claims, safety language, and affiliate modules are reviewed independently. Not personal medical advice.

Editorial Standards →

Help improve this profile

Was this useful for your research?

These controls record only the page and the structured choice you make when analytics consent is enabled. Please don’t include personal medical information in research requests.

Was this evidence summary clear?

Did you find what you were researching?

Suggest an ingredient, comparison, or study →

Free safety checklist

Get the Elecampane research notes

Evidence summaries, dosing context, and safety updates for this herb — straight to your inbox.

We use your email to send the checklist and occasional evidence-first supplement updates. Unsubscribe anytime. Privacy policy.

← Back to herbs librarySafety checker →