Herb Profile

Acerola

Malpighia emarginata

Acerola (Malpighia emarginata) carries a Grade C rating — limited evidence.

Last reviewed: 3 sources citedReport a correctionProfile-wide ·C Limited

Use extra caution Immune active potential; use caution with autoimmune disease, transplant medicines, immunosuppressants, and during active cancer treatment unless clinician supervised. Details

Evidence
Limited Evidence
Typical onset
Varies by prep
Safety rating
Moderate caution
Best for
Antioxidant, Stress resilience, Inflammatory signaling
Avoid / review if
Kidney Stone Risk, Iron Overload Conditions, G6PD Deficiency Caution With Very High Vitamin C Dosing
Acerola monograph visual
Generated profile category visual

At a glance

From this profile's structured data
Evidence
Grade C
Safety
Immune-active potential; use caution with autoimmune disease, transplant medicines, immunosuppressants, and during active cancer treatment unless clinician-supervised.
Profile context
antioxidant
Next steps

Continue reading

Safety

Safety & Cautions

Immune active potential; use caution with autoimmune disease, transplant medicines, immunosuppressants, and during active cancer treatment unless clinician supervised.

Elevated caution

Caution level: Elevated. One caution category applies — read it before use.

Detailed safety fields

Pregnancy, breastfeeding, and contraindications

  • Kidney Stone Risk
  • Iron Overload Conditions
  • G6PD Deficiency Caution With Very High Vitamin C Dosing

Full safety note

  • Immune active potential; use caution with autoimmune disease, transplant medicines, immunosuppressants, and during active cancer treatment unless clinician supervised.

Evidence

Evidence Summary

Evidence lens

Read as directional context, not settled clinical proof.

LimitedLimited Evidence

Human clinical evidence: Present in source signals

Mechanistic / preclinical: Mechanism mappedInflammatory Signaling Modulation · Oxidative Stress Modulation · Immune Signaling Modulation

Research maturity: Emerging researchLong Term Human Evidence May Be Limited.

Safety boundary: Safety note availableImmune active potential; use caution with autoimmune disease, transplant medicines, immunosuppressants, and during active cancer treatment unless clinician supervised.

This profile cites 3 human studies.

Study design details
Evidence Grade

Grade C: Limited Evidence

Evaluation of methodological rigor, population reach, and evidence alignment.

Design Match
Randomized controlled trial
Risk of Bias
Low
Consistency
Not assessed
Strongest recorded design is a randomized controlled trial, drawn from 3 recorded studies, 1 in people.
How evidence grades work

Each grade reflects the strength and consistency of published human evidence — not marketing claims. Grades are based on study count, design quality, effect size, consistency, and recency.

Strong
Multiple RCTs, consistent direction, adequate effect size
Moderate
Some RCTs or consistent observational data in humans
Preliminary / Mixed
Animal or in-vitro only, or conflicting human data
Traditional / Theoretical
Traditional use only; no controlled human trials
Clinical Study Summaries (3)1 human evidence source · 1 human trial · Participant totals not consistently reported · Consistency not yet classifiable

Filter by study class

Showing 3 of 3 studies.

What the evidence actually shows

This table contains 3 structured sources, including 1 human evidence source; 1 is a human trial.

StudyDesignNDoseDurationPopulationOutcomeResult & magnitudeSource

A Collagen Supplement Improves Skin Hydration, Elasticity, Roughness, and Density: Results of a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Blind Study

Bolke L et al. · Nutrients · 2019

Background
Randomized controlled trial

Randomly assigns participants to interventions or controls, reducing many sources of bias when the trial is conducted well.

PubMed

Acerola (Malpighia emarginata) Anti-Inflammatory Activity-A Review

Olędzki R et al. · Int J Mol Sci · 2024

Background
Narrative review

Summarizes selected literature without the full prespecified search and selection methods of a systematic review.

PubMed

Acerola, an untapped functional superfruit: a review on latest frontiers

Prakash A et al. · J Food Sci Technol · 2018

Background
Narrative review

Summarizes selected literature without the full prespecified search and selection methods of a systematic review.

PubMed

Dosing & Timing

No standardized dose
Preparation specific; use standardized product label for Fruit powder and require source backed dosage review before therapeutic claims.
How Acerola works

Simplified mechanism pathway based on preclinical and pharmacological evidence. Does not confirm clinical efficacy.

Mechanism Pathway — How Acerola Works

How Acerola WorksAcerola acts on biological target pathways via anti inflammatory, leading to antioxidant efct.AcerolaBiological TargetBiological pathwayAnti InflammatoryAntioxidant EfctCell protectionAntioxidantParallel pathway
CompoundTarget / ReceptorMechanismEffect / Outcome
Mechanisms & biological pathways (preclinical)
  • Inflammatory Signaling Modulation
  • Oxidative Stress Modulation
  • Immune Signaling Modulation

Compare related active botanicals

Explore botanicals with similar chemistry, effects, or safety considerations in the Botanical Activity Atlas.

Guides that use Acerola

Condition guides

Compare & Sourcing

Compare side-by-side tradeoffs or verify active marker guidelines.

Review available sources for Acerola

Independent database mapping — evaluated separately from safety and efficacy scores.

Check sourcing options

Affiliate disclosure: Shopping links may earn this site a commission at no cost to you. Links are chosen on quality and availability, never commission tiers; safety warnings and evidence ratings stay independent.

Safety first · Harm reduction

This information is educational and not medical advice. Start low, avoid risky combinations, and consult a licensed clinician before making health decisions—especially if you use medications, have diagnosed conditions, or are pregnant/breastfeeding.

Learn how we evaluate confidence, safety, and intensity on the methodology page.

Editorial Review

Checked against primary sources, cited evidence, and contraindication language before publication. Evidence claims, safety language, and affiliate modules are reviewed independently. Not personal medical advice.

Editorial Standards →

Help improve this profile

Was this useful for your research?

These controls record only the page and the structured choice you make when analytics consent is enabled. Please don’t include personal medical information in research requests.

Was this evidence summary clear?

Did you find what you were researching?

Free safety checklist

Get the Acerola research notes

Evidence summaries, dosing context, and safety updates for this herb — straight to your inbox.

We use your email to send the checklist and occasional evidence-first supplement updates. Unsubscribe anytime. Privacy policy.