Related Herbs
Botanicals connected by the same goals, effects, or research topics.
Herb Profile
Banaba
Lagerstroemia speciosa
Banaba (Lagerstroemia speciosa) carries an editorial Grade B rating, but the studies recorded on this profile do not demonstrate that grade.
Last reviewed: •3 sources citedReport a correctionProfile-wide ·Unassigned
Standard caution — Hypoglycemia risk Details
- Evidence
- Editorial Grade Not Demonstrated By Recorded Studies
- Typical onset
- Varies by prep
- Safety rating
- Low caution
- Best for
- Metabolic
- Avoid / review if
- Antidiabetics
At a glance
From this profile's structured data- Evidence
- Editorial grade not demonstrated by recorded studies
- Safety
- Hypoglycemia risk
- Profile context
- metabolic
Next stepsWhere to go next — guides & comparisons
Continue reading
- If you want to browse more herbs → All herbs
Safety
Safety & Cautions
Hypoglycemia risk
Standard caution
Caution level: Standard. No specific caution categories were detected in the source record.
Detailed safety fields
Pregnancy, breastfeeding, and contraindications
- Antidiabetics
Full safety note
- Hypoglycemia risk
Evidence-based safety
Caution when combined
Severity and certainty are shown separately. A high-priority caution can still be theoretical: these pairings are screened from shared contraindication mechanisms and are not automatically documented clinical interactions. Provenance identifies the source fields that produced each flag; it does not upgrade the certainty of the pairwise claim.
Moderate Caution
110 flagged pairingsBlood-sugar lowering
Moderate Caution
110 flagged pairingsBlood-sugar lowering
Representative pairings are shown below. Large mechanism groups are intentionally summarized to keep profiles focused and crawl-efficient.
Blood-sugar loweringCertainty: Theoretical
Data provenance recorded for 110 of 110 pairings in this mechanism group.
- Acarbose — Theoretical interaction certainty
- ajoene — Theoretical interaction certainty
- Allicin — Theoretical interaction certainty
- Aloe Vera — Theoretical interaction certainty
- Alpha-Lipoic Acid — Theoretical interaction certainty
- American Ginseng Extract — Theoretical interaction certainty
- Andrographis — Theoretical interaction certainty
- Anemarrhena Asphodeloides — Theoretical interaction certainty
- Tarragon — Theoretical interaction certainty
- Ashoka — Theoretical interaction certainty
- Astragalus — Theoretical interaction certainty
- Astragalus Membranaceus — Theoretical interaction certainty
+98 more pairings share this mechanism. Use the Safety Checker to review a specific combination.
Evidence
Evidence Summary
Evidence lens
Treat this profile as unresolved until source review is complete.
Needs reviewEditorial Grade Not Demonstrated By Recorded Studies
Human clinical evidence: Not the primary signal
Mechanistic / preclinical: Mechanism mapped — Metabolic Regulation · AMPK Signaling · Glucose Metabolism Support
Research maturity: Theoretical / mechanistic research — Mechanistic or unresolved evidence is kept separate from established human outcomes.
Safety boundary: Safety note available — Hypoglycemia risk
This profile cites 3 human studies.
Study design details
Evidence Grade
Evidence grade not assigned
Evaluation of methodological rigor, population reach, and evidence alignment.
- Design Match
- Narrative review
- Risk of Bias
- High
- Consistency
- Not assessed
Strongest recorded design is a narrative review, drawn from 2 recorded studies, none of which measured an outcome in people.
How evidence grades work
Each grade reflects the strength and consistency of published human evidence — not marketing claims. Grades are based on study count, design quality, effect size, consistency, and recency.
- Strong
- Multiple RCTs, consistent direction, adequate effect size
- Moderate
- Some RCTs or consistent observational data in humans
- Preliminary / Mixed
- Animal or in-vitro only, or conflicting human data
- Traditional / Theoretical
- Traditional use only; no controlled human trials
Clinical Study Summaries (3)0 human evidence sources · 0 human trials · Participant totals not consistently reported · Consistency not yet classifiable
Filter by study class
Showing 3 of 3 studies.
What the evidence actually shows
This table contains 3 structured sources, including 0 human evidence sources; 0 are human trials.
| Study | Design | N | Dose | Duration | Population | Outcome | Result & magnitude | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A review of the efficacy and safety of banaba (Lagerstroemia speciosa L.) and corosolic acid Stohs SJ et al. · Phytother Res · 2012 Background | Narrative review Summarizes selected literature without the full prespecified search and selection methods of a systematic review. | — | — | — | — | — | — | PubMed → |
Derosa G et al. · Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci · 2025 Background | Narrative review Summarizes selected literature without the full prespecified search and selection methods of a systematic review. | — | — | — | — | — | — | PubMed → |
Hong H et al. · J Med Food · 2004 Background | Other / unclear The study design is not yet classified clearly enough to infer its place in the evidence hierarchy. | — | — | — | — | — | — | PubMed → |
Dosing & Timing
- Dose guidance
- 32 48 mg corosolic acid equivalent
How Banaba works
Simplified mechanism pathway based on preclinical and pharmacological evidence. Does not confirm clinical efficacy.
Mechanism Pathway — How Banaba Works
CompoundTarget / ReceptorMechanismEffect / Outcome
Mechanisms & biological pathways (preclinical)
- Metabolic Regulation
- AMPK Signaling
- Glucose Metabolism Support
Active Compounds
Key constituents studied in Banaba, with full pharmacology and safety profiles.
Compare related active botanicals
Explore botanicals with similar chemistry, effects, or safety considerations in the Botanical Activity Atlas.
Guides that use Banaba
Condition guides
Compare & Sourcing
Compare side-by-side tradeoffs or verify active marker guidelines.
Continue comparing
Safety first · Harm reduction
This information is educational and not medical advice. Start low, avoid risky combinations, and consult a licensed clinician before making health decisions—especially if you use medications, have diagnosed conditions, or are pregnant/breastfeeding.
Learn how we evaluate confidence, safety, and intensity on the methodology page.
Editorial Review
Checked against primary sources, cited evidence, and contraindication language before publication. Evidence claims, safety language, and affiliate modules are reviewed independently. Not personal medical advice.
Help improve this profile
Was this useful for your research?
These controls record only the page and the structured choice you make when analytics consent is enabled. Please don’t include personal medical information in research requests.
Was this evidence summary clear?
Did you find what you were researching?
Free safety checklist
Get the Banaba research notes
Evidence summaries, dosing context, and safety updates for this herb — straight to your inbox.
We use your email to send the checklist and occasional evidence-first supplement updates. Unsubscribe anytime. Privacy policy.